Compliance software built for how construction actually works.
Most platforms were built for corporate IT. The language is wrong, the structure does not match site based operations, and the evidence does not satisfy a certifying body. Vissibl was built for operational businesses.
A full compliance gap analysis surfaced in a single Vissi Audit session.
ISO 9001, 14001, 45001 and 27001 managed as one programme with one audit schedule.
Identified in a single Vissi Research session. Not caught by the manual process before.
One programme, many obligations.
Australian construction businesses run an integrated management system across multiple sites, rotating workforces and subcontractor chains that change project by project. Documents need to stay current, evidence needs to hold, and a surveillance audit can land at any point in the calendar year.
What an Australian certifying body actually looks for.
Six evidence trails decide whether your surveillance audit is routine or painful. Each one is a standing capability in Vissibl, not a scramble the month before.
Every controlled document with its revision history, review date and approval record.
Root cause, corrective action and closure verification in one traceable record.
All clauses in scope covered at planned intervals, with actions tracked to closure.
Competency requirements defined per role, with evidence the person meets them.
Reviews at planned intervals with documented inputs, agenda and actioned outputs.
Assessment, selection and monitoring against defined criteria. Insurance currency, safety data, inductions.
Good tools, different jobs.
Most platforms in Australian construction do one job well. None of them manage certification evidence, which is why the fallback is a consultant built SharePoint that decays after year one.
| Platform | Built for | Certification management |
|---|---|---|
| SafetyCulture | Inspections, toolbox talks, pre starts | No clause level compliance, controlled documents or audit programmes |
| HammerTech | Inductions, SWMS, site access | No ISO 9001 or 14001 capability |
| HSI Donesafe | Incident reporting, risk registers | Evidence depth for ISO audits is not its core use case |
| Procore, Aconex | Contracts, drawings, RFIs | Project safety docs only, no management system evidence |
| SharePoint plus consultant | Initial certified structure | Decays. Documents lapse, NCRs live in a spreadsheet, audits get skipped |
| Vissibl | Certification management for operational businesses | Clause level evidence, continuous gap analysis, always audit ready |
What the software needs to do.
Evidence organised by clause, not by date or form type.
Versions, review dates, approvals and automatic archiving.
Opening to closure verification, every step on the record.
Plannable a year ahead, findings tracked to closure.
Role based requirements, expiry tracking, gaps surfaced early.
Inputs, minutes and outputs recorded for every cycle.
Risk scoring and certificate currency, running continuously.
An active system that surfaces gaps as they appear.
Per framework, not per head. Every supervisor gets a seat.
Built in from day one, not bolted on.
Three standards, one programme.
ISO 9001, 14001 and 45001 share the same High Level Structure. Managing them separately is more work, more cost and weaker evidence. In Vissibl they sit in one workspace with evidence linked where controls overlap.
- One audit schedule across all frameworks
- One non conformance register
- One management review process
- Evidence linked across overlapping controls